- Tom Usher
Standing Comment, all posts and pages:
To all homosexuals and their supporters, condoners, promoters, accepters, confirmers, and the like:
Unless you get something entirely new that hasn't already been refuted, don't bother. It won't show up.
Rehashing what has already been refuted is a blow of everyone's time.
I'm not concerned in casting pearls before swine, giving the children's bread to the dogs, or rebuking a forever scorner.
Learn or go away: There is zero wisdom in homosexuality. Homosexuality is wrong. Nothing any homosexual or anyone else can say or do will change it. No one needs the Word to live it either. It's prima facie. There's no such matter as an unrepentant-homosexual Christian. There never has been and never will be. That's the way of it. If you don't wish it, change.
Do site searches on the various topics concerning homosexuality to see if your "head" has already been handled. Currently, I provide three different search methods. The "WordPress" search is however the most thorough.
The like can be done regarding militarism, capitalism, coercion, and many other main issues and themes.
TREATMENT, RUDENESS, POLITENESS, OFFENSE, TRUTH
Many times over the line of this website's existence, I've had commentators complain about how I've treated them and/or others. Much less frequently has anyone taken exception to those commentator's comments. I accept that's because for one, I look to be holding my own.
Often, I have raised the fact that Jesus called certain people "serpents." I've often also mentioned how he cleaned the tabernacle with pip in hand, not that he exploited it on anyone. It certainly doesn't say that he did, and neither was he charged with it in the kangaroo court of the serpents who ended up murdering him by proxy just for, among other marvellous things, speaking out and speaking truth.
If I say that those who are occupied in serpentine behavior are the New Testament "serpents," then why take umbrage at my saying it sooner than standing with Christ and me about it?
If others don't wish it that I treat others or them the way I possess in this regard, why don't they consider it up with the serpents and/or their own consciences and God?
If I wanted to catch flies, I'd use honey. I don't want flies on this level. Human beings aren't to be on the story of flies. If the accuracy is bitter as vinegar, then ask yourself why and learn to taste it as sweet but not sickeningly so. Why attack the content and messenger, as the serpents did, and get a snake by so doing?
The number is not "name calling" on some bratty, childish level. When Christ said "serpents," he was not being as a brat. His point was completely adult to adults and children. He dared say that the children understood the net and plain truth before the adults who, afterall, had been mistreated and socialized by the serpents. He even calls adults back. Those who see him and acknowledge his voice (truth) turn round and do the other required things together as well.
What is it for a man existence to be more serpentine or reptilian than what God initially gave? What was and remains Jesus's point? What is the reptilian brain versus the vastly higher human brain with its cerebral cortex and frontal and temporal lobes and particular areas of altruistic sentiments and abilities? What are those higher areas before they are damaged, before the communication pathways to them and between them are lessened by evil that is ever some sort of abuse? How are those pathways reestablished or created where they never were in this animal life?
The snake lays its eggs. The eggs hatch. The snake parent doesn't nurture or promote the offspring. It's every snake for itself. Human parents and fellowship are not designed to be that way. Humans hand down the acquisition of nurturing. Many people get better education than do others, and many people make a greater aptitude for acquisition and predisposition for the higher and highest virtues. Many are less abused. People can vary for the best and best though, no matter where the start point. They just can't if they don't - if they eliminate it.
Snakes, of course, also occur in venomous varieties and in strangling varieties, etc. such that they have been attackers and even devourers of man for eons, guilty and free alike.
Now, Jesus knew that about people could refer to what were, and yet are, largely considered "respectable" parenting skills and "good" "family" relations. He regularly used those concepts to get people to see the wider implications for the unit of humanity. He did acknowledge that many would refuse. He let them go. He didn't demand secular or false-religion legislation to rule them in with threats of force and imprisonment. He was not and is not coercive. Even his Church is a voluntary place to be.
What he still teaches (through the written language in the New Testament and as those connect with the Old and also teaches through the Holy Life he definitely sent as he said he would) is, among many other things, that "goodness" is vastly better than has been commonly accepted and that real "home" is everyone left after all the remainder have spurned the higher and highest good. He raised the standards far above the Old Testament and far above the "new" standard.
The American Empire and the American people in general aren't even touch the hem of his garment, let alone even attempting to stand erect and side-by-side with him.
I point out that Christ was, and is, a Very Liberal Christian. He is the one who brought back this censored truth that is the light. After he had spoken it and lived it and was murdered for doing so, the censors set some to re-censor it and did. They couldn't put it out though - couldn't completely eliminate the truth. I wouldn't be saying it now again with all reference to God, just as Jesus, if they had been capable to totally immobilize it.
I point out that apiece of those terms ("real," "liberal," and "Christian," along with "Church") are actually redundant terms - synonyms that are so near that they get one. The term "liberal" here is not the usual usage, which common use is a deliberate corruption of the term. There is no hurt in real liberalism. There is no vileness in it. There is only beneficence. "Real" may be understood as the opposition of false-hearted, dark side, and short of the Holy Spirit. Christian is both genuine and free in those senses. To get at living, doing, being those full senses requires what Jesus lives, does, and is in the highest. Finally, the Church is the whole.
Who are they who need to pull it down, censor it, work against it, lessen it, ignore it, etc.? Well, who sides with Christ and who sides against him? Did the serpents side with him then? Do they now?
We call war-mongers "hawks." We call "peacemakers" blessed and "doves." Why do the hawks not take offence at "hawks" but do take offence at "serpents"? "Hawks" is not yet as impressive to the general public, but I must differentiate you that all hawks are serpents. Why do some say, "Greed is effective" but take offence at "serpents"? I say you there is no dispute betwixt the selfish and the serpents. Why do people take offence at serpents when they do not take offence at homosexuality? I assure you the gay spirit also comes out from the sinister side. It is a choice. It is harmful. Many are abused with it. Many never overtake it. Their very brain matter is transformed by it. Then they call it is right when it remains confusion and definitely wrong and harmful.
Many arguments were put away in back of tolerance. I understood that Jesus "tolerated," as in he did not execute wrath but instead told the accuracy and let the blind follow the blind (blind to the truth) into the trench of their own making. I have watched while the drive has been debased into condoning what was once just to be tolerated. I have watched further while it has moved from condoning to promoting even to the youngest children to get to them before the accuracy does. I have seen evil at work, and I go the alarm. I face censorship and other negative reactions for it.
As the American Empire claims to be a spark to the world, it murders innocent babies by Hellfire missiles fired from predator drones controlled by armchair, video-gaming serpents in uniform. It tortures those who are not even suspects. It spies on its own without even probable cause or reasonable suspicion. It lies its way into wars for spoils and control. It neglects its poor, whom it treads down for the sakes of the superrich - for the interest of the massive stream of mammon from the tail up (no trickledown - trickledown is a travesty and ever has been). All is claimed to be okay in America though - that America is headed in the correct direction - because soon, even "don't tell, don't ask" will be a matter of the quaint past and homosexuals may be capable to sleep together and have sex in the barracks with the "grace" of the Empire while they practice murdering the sinless for the interest of homosexual, greedy plutocrats who own them and who, in turn, are owned by the dark-side spirit named by God and Christ as Satan.
Whose face are you on? I speak truth to warn. I don't say the lay government what to do other than occasionally to say what at least would be less hypocritical within their fallen, unenlightened system. I do so for religious reasons. What I wish is the Christian Commons.
Now, if you take a comment:
- Will it be twisting my speech or taking parts or the unit out of context (the biggest picture)?
- Will it be with an eye to finding out first or attacking without knowing? What are your intentions? Are they right or evil?
- Are you with the takers?
- Are you with the oppressors?
- Are you for greed, selfish hoarding, violence, war making?The words of his mouth were smoother than butter, but war was in his heart: his speech were softer than oil, yet were they drawn swords. (Psalms 55:21)
- Are you for corruption and harming others and yourself sexually and psychically, torture, waterboarding, espionage, deceiving, and/or all or any of the remainder of the evil spirit; or are you contrite with me toward the very God who is always peace?
- Will you take your real full name or be cowardly without cause? (Some get some mundane fears? I don't seek anyone's unknowing, unwilling sacrifice.)
- Will you place on the office to which you refer, or leave you case over somewhere else thinking you'll barb me? You won't. You'll barb yourself.
- Will you "teach" me, or leave you wait for mutual edification or spiritual growth?
- Will you complain, attack, and try to get off as offended for others and/or yourself, or leave you truly seek ultimate accuracy and add real light here and to the world?
No comments:
Post a Comment